MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

First Application of a Novel Brain Template: Motor Training Improves Cortico-cerebellar Connectivity in Cerebellar Ataxia

2025· article· en· W4412829765 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Nettekoven, Rossitza Draganova, Katharina M. Steiner, Sophia L Goericke, Andreas Deistung, Jürgen Konczak, Dagmar Timmann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsCerebellumNeuroscienceCerebellar DegenerationCerebellar ataxiaPsychologySupplementary motor areaCerebellar cortexPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineAtaxiaFunctional magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

People with cerebellar degeneration show characteristic ataxic motor impairments. Despite cerebellar dysfunction, they can improve motor performance through sensorimotor training. Yet, how such training changes functional brain networks affected by cerebellar degeneration is unknown. We here investigated neuroplastic changes in the cortico-cerebellar network after a 5-d forearm training in 40 patients with mild to severe cerebellar degeneration and 40 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Human participants (41 female) were assigned to one of four motor training conditions, varying online visual feedback and explicit verbal feedback. Anatomical and resting-state fMRI was collected on days before and after training. To overcome the limitations of standard brain templates that fail when encountering severe anatomical abnormalities, we developed a specific template for comparing cerebellar patients with controls. Our new template reduced the spatial spread of cerebellar anatomical landmarks by 30% and tripled fMRI noise classification accuracy. Using this pipeline, we found that patients showed impaired connectivity between cerebellar motor regions and neocortical visuomotor and premotor regions at baseline compared with controls, whereas their corticocortical connectivity remained intact. Training with vision strengthened connectivity in the cortico-cerebellar visuomotor network contralateral to the trained arm in all participants. Cerebellar patients exhibited additional increased connectivity ipsilateral to the training arm in this network. Further, training with explicit verbal feedback affected connectivity between a cerebellar cognitive region and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, although post hoc tests did not reach significance. These results document enhanced cortico-cerebellar connectivity as a neurophysiological response to visuomotor training in people with cerebellar degeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→