Trend-Enabled Recommender System with Diversity Enhancer for Crop Recommendation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Achieving optimal agricultural yields and promoting sustainable farming relies on accurate crop recommendations. However, the applicability of many current systems is limited by their considerable computational requirements and dependence on comprehensive datasets, especially in resource-limited contexts. This paper presents HOLISTIQ RS, a novel crop recommendation system explicitly designed for operation on low-specification hardware and in data-scarce regions. HOLISTIQ RS combines collaborative filtering with a Markov model to predict appropriate crop choices, drawing upon user profiles, regional agricultural data, and past crop performance. Results indicate that HOLISTIQ RS provides a significant increase in recommendation accuracy, achieving a MAP@5 of 0.31 and nDCG@5 of 0.41, outperforming standard collaborative filtering methods (the KNN achieved MAP@5 of 0.28 and nDCG@5 of 0.38, and the ANN achieved MAP@5 of 0.25 and nDCG@5 of 0.35). Significantly, the system also demonstrates enhanced recommendation diversity, achieving an Item Variety (IV@5) of 23%, which is absent in deterministic baselines. Significantly, the system is engineered for reduced energy consumption and can be deployed on low-cost hardware. This provides a feasible and adaptable method for encouraging informed decision-making and promoting sustainable agricultural practices in areas where resources are constrained, with an emphasis on lower energy usage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".