MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412834587 · doi:10.1101/2025.07.28.25332302

Association between gastric rhythm and gastroesophageal reflux defined by simultaneous body surface gastric mapping and 24-hour pH testing

2025· preprint· en· W4412834587 on OpenAlexaff
William Xu, Sam Simmonds, Daphne Foong, Sameer Bhat, Chris Varghese, Christopher N. Andrews, Gabriel Schamberg, Armen A. Gharibans, Thomas L. Abell, David Rowbotham, Vincent Ho, Stefan Calder, Gregory O’Grady

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeartburnGERDRefluxGastroenterologyInternal medicineMedicineNauseaGastroparesisGastric acidBiomarkerStomachGastric emptyingDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Abnormal gastric myoelectrical function may contribute to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We assessed if myoelectrical abnormalities measured using body surface gastric mapping were correlated with reflux measured by 24 hr pH testing, and symptom severity. Methods Gastric Alimetry ® was performed simultaneously on patients undergoing 24 hr pH testing for investigation of reflux symptoms, with a standardised 4.5 hr test and validated symptom logging. Data were segmented into 15-minute epochs. Correlations between myoelectric activity, reflux events, and symptoms were assessed, including temporal correlations adjusted for repeated measures. Results Forty subjects were recruited (mean age 46.5 years, 60% female): 20 undergoing pH testing (12 with GERD and 8 symptomatic patients without), and 20 controls. GERD patients displayed less stable Gastric Alimetry® Rhythm-Index (GA-RI) compared with controls (p=0.011), but not with non-GERD patients (p=0.605). Decreasing GA-RI was associated with esophageal acid exposure (DeMeester score; r=-0.46, p=0.042). Periods of decreased GA-RI were not temporally correlated with reflux (r=0.08, p=0.182), or heartburn severity (r=0.04, p=0.309), but were correlated with nausea (r=-0.22, p<0.001) and excessive fullness (r=-0.28, p<0.001). Conclusion Gastric rhythm instability is associated with increased symptom severity and overall acid exposure in GERD patients, although no temporal link to heartburn was found. Reduced rhythm stability was temporally associated with increased nausea and fullness. GA-RI offers an emerging biomarker of gastric dysfunction in patients with GERD symptomatology. Study highlights What is known ● Heartburn is common and often medically refractory ● Gastric conduction and motility abnormalities may contribute to symptoms but the temporal relationship is unknown What is new here ● Gastric rhythm abnormalities measured by Gastric Alimetry® are correlated with increasing reflux burden and symptom severity ● There is no temporal association between gastric rhythm and reflux events ● Gastric rhythm abnormalities may predispose patients to worse reflux, but there is no direct temporal correlation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments→French-language works237,207→