The Effect of Isometric Exercise on Changes in Pain and Functional Activity in Osteoarthritis Knee Patients at Samarinda Class IV Hospital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osteoarthritis of the knee is a degenerative disease that directly impacts joint cartilage, characterized by pain and stiffness, causing a decrease in function and quality of life of sufferers. This study aimed to determine the effect of giving isometric exercise on pain and functional activity changes in patients with knee osteoarthritis at Hospital Level IV in Samarinda. This study used a pre-experimental method with a pre-test and post-test one-group design approach. Seventeen knee osteoarthritis respondents with pain and functional activity disturbances were given an isometric exercise with a frequency of three times a week for one month. The measurement tool used to evaluate pain and functional activity was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The statistical test using the paired sample t-test showed that p <0.05 indicated that giving isometric exercise affected in pain and functional activity changes in patients with knee osteoarthritis at Hospital Level IV in Samarinda, then H0 was rejected, and Ha was accepted. This indicates that giving isometric exercise affects changes in pain and functional activity in osteoarthritis knee at Hospital Level IV in Samarinda.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".