MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412855771 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558994

Evaluating risk factors for surgical site infections following open reduction and internal fixation surgery for ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4412855771 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Feifan Luan, Cong Zheng, Yu‐Zhong Zheng, Jiayi Chen, Yiyan Wu, Chenxiao Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Public Health · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGuangzhou UniversityGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
KeywordsMedicineCochrane LibraryObservational studySystematic reviewInternal fixationMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialPhysical therapyMEDLINEAnkleSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ankle fractures are common injuries requiring surgical intervention, specifically open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), which carries a risk of surgical site infections (SSIs). Identifying and understanding the risk factors associated with SSIs in these patients is crucial for improving surgical outcomes and patient care. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on September 19, 2023, without restrictions on publication period or language. The inclusion criteria comprised observational studies and randomized controlled trials that investigated risk factors for SSIs following ORIF for ankle fractures. Exclusion criteria included non-empirical studies, studies without specific outcomes on SSIs, non-ORIF surgeries, and studies with incomplete data. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and statistical analyses were performed using Stata 17. Results: Out of 1,255 initially identified articles, eight studies met the inclusion criteria after deduplication, screening, and full-text review. These studies highlighted several risk factors for SSIs, including diabetes, open fractures, high-energy injuries, and smoking, with diabetes and open fractures significantly increasing the risk. Antibiotic prophylaxis emerged as a protective factor. The quality assessment revealed a high standard of research quality among the included studies, and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. Conclusion: This meta-analysis underscores the importance of recognizing diabetes, open fractures, high-energy injuries, smoking, and a BMI exceeding 30 as significant risk factors for SSIs following ORIF for ankle fractures. The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis serves as a protective measure. Healthcare providers should incorporate strategies to mitigate these risks, enhancing postoperative care and reducing the incidence of surgical site infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Public HealthSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207