Invasive Diatom Species in Sinking Material of the Lofoten Basin (the Norwegian Sea)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The invasive diatom species in sinking material of the Lofoten Basin of the Norwegian Sea have been studied in detail for the first time. The material was collected from sediment traps monthly during a year (2017–2018). A total of eleven invasive diatom species were identified; the predominant were Fragilariopsis oceanica, Podosira glacialis, Thalassiosira antarctica, Neodenticula seminae, Shionodiscus oestrupii, etc. Multivariate analysis has shown a reliable relationship between the within-year variability of vertical fluxes of invasive diatom species and the contents of N, P, POC and the Si/Al ratio in the sinking material. The appearance of the North Pacific planktonic species Neodenticula seminae in the Lofoten Basin sinking material is related to the transport of warm North Atlantic water masses from the Labrador Sea. The periodical increase in the number of sea-ice and ice-neritic species in the Lofoten Basin (the insignificant increase from October to December and more significant from March to April) is related to the course of seasonal variability of the sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean and sea ice export through the Fram Strait into the North Atlantic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".