MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412865079 · doi:10.1080/01431161.2025.2528256

Near-real time monitoring of burned area at global scale based on deep learning

2025· article· en· W4412865079 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Padilla, Rubén Ramo, José Gómez‐Dans, Sergio Sierra, Bernardo Mota, Roselyne Lacaze, Kevin Tansey

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsTheratechnologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)Remote sensingDeep learningEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceMeteorologyGeologyArtificial intelligenceCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in land surface reflectance modelling and machine learning techniques opened new opportunities for deriving burned area at a near-real time (NRT) basis and globally. Built from these recent advances, this paper describes a new and computationally efficient approach used by the Copernicus Land Monitoring Service (CLMS) to map burned area from Sentinel-3 OLCI&SLSTR reflectance data and VIIRS active fires at NRT within one day after each image acquisition, complemented by a non-time critical (NTC) product delivered several months after. A neural network is designed to predict fractional burned area on a per-pixel basis from time series of surface reflectance data. The neural network is used to generate time series of burned area detection maps, which are revised by active fire detections spatiotemporal densities to filter out areas likely to be related to land surface changes other than fires, such as agricultural practices or fast vegetation senescence. The algorithm was calibrated with data from 2019, and its quality was assessed with data from 2020, along with other global products, through an intercomparison analysis and a validation analysis using a stratified global random sampling of 30 m reference burned area data. The quality assessment included the NRT and NTC products presented here (CLMBA40nrt and CLMBA40ntc, respectively) and other global products available for 2020, the NTC product currently distributed by the CLMS (CLMBA31ntc), the MODIS-MCD64 Collection 6 (MCD64), the Sentinel-3 OLCI Climate Change Service C3SBA11 and the Sentinel-3 OLCI&SLSTR ESA’s Climate Change Initiative Fire Disturbance FIRECCIS311. The accuracies of CLMBA40ntc and CLMBA40nrt (Dice coefficient (DC) 65.0% and 56.5% respectively) are higher than CLMBA31ntc, MCD64 and C3SBA11 (DC ∼45%) and higher and similar, respectively, compared to FIRECCIS311 (DC 56.0%). The new algorithm described here allows for unprecedented accuracy and timeliness of global burned area estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Remote SensingSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207