Effects of exercise training on cognitive function in community-dwelling older women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Taiwan has witnessed a continuous increase in average life expectancy. However, older adult women in community settings face more pronounced challenges within the context of a super-aged society, such as sedentary lifestyles, excessive television consumption, and low engagement in educational and social activities. Moreover, their health indicators are consistently less favorable than those of males. This study aimed to investigate the effects of exercise training on the cognitive function of older female residents in community care centers. METHODS: The study randomly assigned 30 female residents of Kaohsiung City, aged 70-85, into two groups: the intervention group (n = 15) and the control group (n = 15). The intervention group underwent a 20-week cognitive activity program, while the control group received no training. Statistical analyses were conducted using two-way mixed design ANOVA and t-test. RESULTS: The results of this study demonstrated significant differences (P <.05) in the four cognitive domains. Overall, the intervention group exhibited a substantial effect on the total Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score, attention, delayed recall, and orientation compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this study, it may be suggested that educational practitioners develop tailored cognitive activity programs for older female residents in community care centers. These programs should consider participants' varying physical and cognitive abilities, available space, and appropriate teaching aids. Such initiatives hold the potential to significantly enhance the cognitive functions and overall well-being of older female adults residents in community care centers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".