The adoption of a westernized gut microbiome in Indian Immigrants and Indo-Canadians is associated with dietary acculturation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indian immigration to westernized countries has recently surged, increasing their risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) post-migration. While crucial for understanding IBD risk, the gut microbiome remains understudied in Indians. This cross-sectional study examines the impact of westernization on the gut microbiomes of Indians residing in India, Indo-Immigrants, and Indo-Canadians compared to Euro-Canadian and Euro-Immigrant controls. Stool samples for 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing assessed microbial taxa and functional profiles, alongside dietary and demographic data to evaluate lifestyle patterns. Indians and Indo-Immigrants had distinct microbiotas from controls, with high abundances of Prevotella spp. and CAZymes reflecting their high complex carbohydrate diet. Indo-Canadians exhibited a transitional microbiome towards westernization, mirroring increasing dietary acculturation. Considering 44% of Canadians are first- and second-generation immigrants and the global adoption of westernized practices, future research should investigate the health implications of such microbiome transitions in immigrant populations and newly industrialized nations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it