Crystallographic Snapshots of Pre- and Post-Lanthanide Halide Hydrolysis─Reaction Products Captured by the 4-Amino-1,2,4-triazole Ligand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Reactions of lanthanide(III) chloride salts with 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole (4-NH 2 -1,2,4-Triaz) in azole melts have led to the isolation of both hydrolysis and nonhydrolysis products in the same synthesis, with the inclusion of a variety of ligands, anions, and water, allowing us to capture crystallographic snapshots of different forms and intermediate hydrolysis fragments. The structural studies reported here include anhydrous and hydrated nonhydrolyzed complexes, which were isolated alongside hydrolysis products, giving oxide/hydroxide lanthanide(III) dimers, tetramers, and ultimately hexamers. The compounds isolated include [Nd 2 Cl 6 (μ 2 -4-NH 2 -1,2,4-Triaz) 4 (4-NH 2 -1,2,4-Triaz) 2 ], [Ce 2 Cl 4 (μ 2 -Cl) 2 (μ 2 -4-NH 2 -1,2,4-Triaz) 4 ] n, [Ce 2 (μ 2 -Cl) 4 (μ 2 -OH) 2 (μ 2 -4-NH 2 -1,2,4-Triaz) 2 ] n, [Ln 4 Cl 4 (μ 2 -Cl) 4 (μ 3 -OH) 4 (μ 2 -4-NH 2 -1,2,4-Triaz) 4 ] n ·2 n H 2 O (Ln = Ce, Nd), and [Ce 6 Cl 6 (μ 6 -O 0.5 )(μ 3 -Cl 0.5 ) 4 (μ 3 -Cl 0.75 ) 3 (μ 3 -OH) 0.75 (μ 2 -4-NH 2 -1,2,4-Triaz) 12 ((OH 2 ) 0.25 ) 2 ] 2 [CeCl 6 ][Cl 9 ]· x H 2 O. In all complexes, all lanthanide atoms are pairwise connected via one or more 4-NH 2 -1,2,4-Triaz ligands and sometimes additional Cl – anions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".