MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412882960 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf246

Effects of combining increased lysine (protein) supply in late gestation and domperidone in lactation on sow and piglet performances

2025· article· en· W4412882960 on OpenAlexaff
C. Farmer, Jakob Christoffer Johannsen, Lee‐Anne Huber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactationDomperidoneGestationLitterAnimal scienceProlactinWeaningBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologySoybean mealPregnancyMedicineDopamineAgronomyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this project was to determine the impact of either increasing standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys intake by 40% in gilts from days 85 to 111 of gestation, or combining that treatment with an increase in prolactin concentrations during lactation, on sow and piglet performances. On day 85 of gestation gilts were divided in three groups: (1) fed SID Lys at estimated NRC requirement (CTL, control, n = 23) until day 111 of gestation, (2) fed SID Lys at 40% above requirement via additional soybean meal (LYS, n = 22) until day 111 of gestation, or (3) fed SID Lys at 40% above requirement via additional soybean meal (LYSDOMP, n = 21) until day 111 of gestation and receiving domperidone throughout lactation. Experimental diets were isoenergetic. The LYSDOMP sows were injected daily with the dopamine receptor antagonist domperidone (0.5 mg/kg body weight, BW) from the day after farrowing until weaning. Additionally, they were fed 0.5 mg/kg BW of domperidone twice daily for the first 4 d of lactation. The CTL and LYS sows received injections and per os treatment with the vehicle. Litter size was standardized to 12 ± 1, and piglets were weighed on days 1, 7, and 22. Sow feed intake was recorded daily. Blood samples were collected on days 84 and 110 of gestation and days 1, 7, and 21 of lactation to measure prolactin, IGF-I, urea, free fatty acids (FFA), glucose (gestation only), and amino acids (gestation only). Milk samples were obtained on day 7 of lactation. Sow BW and backfat thickness throughout the study and feed intake in lactation were not affected by treatments (P > 0.10). Prolactin concentrations were greater for LYSDOMP compared with CTL and LYS sows on days 7 and 21 (P < 0.0001). Treatments did not alter IGF-I, glucose, or FFA concentrations at any time (P > 0.05), and urea was greater in LYS and LYSDOMP than CTL sows on day 110 of gestation (P < 0.05). Estimated milk yield or piglet growth rate was not affected by treatments (P > 0.10). In conclusion, feeding supplementary Lys (protein) in late gestation, either with or without domperidone in lactation, did not increase sow milk yield. Findings emphasize that a greater litter size was likely needed to see beneficial effects of supplementary Lys, and that the use of primiparous sows or inadequate lactational feed intake may have impeded the effects of the domperidone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→