COAL “EXPERIMENT” IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES OF COUNT MIKHAIL S. VORONTSOV IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF THE 19TH CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper analyzes the role of coal in the administrative activities of Mikhail S. Vorontsov, the Novorossiya Governor-General, during the second quarter of the 19th century. The focus of this study is to ascertain the significance of coal as a natural resource for the administrative positioning of the viceroy and the construction of his status. Departing from the analysis of the economic efficiency in coal consumption and the impossibility of “energy transition” in the first half of the 19th century, the paper focuses on coal’s role as a political actor in the administrative life of the Russian Empire during the second quarter of the 19th century. The competition for control over coal also reflects the ideas of Minister of Finance E. F. Kankrin, and M. S. Vorontsov regarding the role of natural resources in the development of the south of the Russian Empire, and also became a prism reflecting different economic ideas. The author posits that the discord between Vorontsov and Kankrin concerning the coal project enabled the Governor-General of the southern region to strengthen his position.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".