MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412893321 · doi:10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100368

Impact of hepatitis C serostatus on health service utilization for opioid-related harms among individuals prescribed opioid agonist therapy: A longitudinal prospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4412893321 on OpenAlexafffund
Paige Guyatt, Glenda Babe, Anastasia Gayowsky, Tea Rosic, Myanca Rodrigues, Paxton Bach, Claire de Oliveira, Jeffrey H. Samet, Geneviève Kerkerian, Jessica Hann, Joanna C. Dionne, Aijaz Ahmed, Donghee Kim, Seonaid Nolan, Lehana Thabane, Zainab Samaan, Brittany B. Dennis

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug and Alcohol Dependence Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of TorontoSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of OttawaCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthBritish Columbia Centre on Substance UseMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareMichael Smith Health Research BCInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
KeywordsSerostatusMedicineOpioidHepatitis COpioid epidemicProspective cohort studyAgonistLongitudinal studyCohortCohort studyInternal medicineFamily medicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Varied substance use outcomes have been reported among individuals with a hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection on opioid agonist treatment (OAT) for opioid use disorder. Accordingly, the current study sought to evaluate the association between HCV serostatus, among other factors, and opioid-related acute health service utilization (e.g., emergency department [ED] visits and hospitalizations) among individuals prescribed OAT. Multi-site prospective cohort study data were used to characterize demographic characteristics, substance use patterns, and physical health amongst individuals prescribed OAT. Logistic regression models were built to estimate the association between HCV-seropositivity and opioid-related ED visits and hospitalizations over a three-year follow up period. Among 3430 participants, 10.6 % ( n = 365) were HCV-seropositive. In the follow-up period, 21.3 % ( n = 730) attended the ED and 8.7 % ( n = 298) were hospitalized for opioid related-harms. HCV-seropositivity was associated with an increased incidence of ED visits for opioid poisoning (9.0 % vs 4.9 % for participants who were HCV-seronegative, p < 0.01) and other opioid-related harms (22.5 % vs. 20.8 % for seronegative participants, p = 0.03). However, multiple logistical regression models showed no association between HCV serostatus and opioid-related health service utilization; rather, injection drug use was a significant predictor of opioid-related ED visits (OR 3.39, p < 0.01) and hospitalizations (OR 1.21, p = 0.01). Among individuals prescribed OAT, those with seropositive HCV have increased incidence of ED visits and hospitalizations for opioid-related harms, an association which may be driven by injection use practices. These findings highlight the importance of screening for injection use practices and health symptoms, as well as the potential role for targeting resources (e.g., harm reduction supplies, education regarding transmission) within this vulnerable subgroup. • Among individuals on opioid agonist therapy, those with hepatitis-C have more opioid-related hospital presentations. • However, hepatitis-C is not a prognostic factor for acute opioid-related presentations. • Injection drug use is the strongest predictor of acute opioid-related presentations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug and Alcohol Dependence ReportsSame topicOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentFrench-language works237,207