MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412899864 · doi:10.51219/jmms/mohammed-s/18

Improved Dosimetry in Radiotherapy with Gold-Coated Fiber Optics

2025· article· en· W4412899864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammed S Mohammed, Zeinab A Said, Asmaa Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicine and Medical Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDosimetryOpticsOptical fiberMaterials sciencePhysicsNuclear medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients receiving radiotherapy, a clinical treatment process in which radiation is used for the treatment of various types of cancer, utilize a variety of radiation sources with unique characteristics and procedures.In vivo dose measurements can help identify systematic and random errors in delivery of the treatment and therefore play an important role in quality assurance.Recently, the photon response of optical fibers has been investigated by many research groups.The small diameters of optical fibers increase the possibility of producing a dosimeter with high spatial resolution, important in the sense that an accurate value for the absorbed dose in the surrounding tissue of the dosimeter can be more accurately reported.Another important advantage of optical fibers as radiation dosimeters is that, unlike conventional TLDs, optical fibers are impervious to water.The aim of this study is to verify the dosimetric use of fiber optics in interface dosimetry and to investigate a novel enhanced dose technique using different gold thicknesses as a coating for fiber optics.Methods: To achieve this goal, commercially available Ge-doped SiO2 optical fibers (Cor Active, Canada) with a core diameter of 50.9 ± 4.1 µm were irradiated using a 250 kVp superficial X-ray machine and a dose of 3 Gy.Before irradiation, fiber optics were prepared and the following steps, preheat annealing and reading, were performed. Results:The results show enhancement with increasing gold (Au) thickness, with the highest percentage dose enhancement of approximately 160% obtained at 80 nm.A slight deviation from the enhancement was obtained at 20 nm, the first thickness of gold.Encouraging results from such studies have paved the way for the development of optical fiber radiation dosimeters specifically tailored to the task of dosimetry in radiotherapy.Conclusion: An optical fiber dosimeter can be placed within the tissue of interest, which is applicable due to its flexibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicine and Medical Studies→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→