MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical Modelling of In Situ Stresses to Investigate the Initiation of Spreads in Sensitive Clay

2025· article· en· W4412904870 on OpenAlexaff
Andries Kirstein, Ariane Locat, HP Jostad, Gustav Grimstad, Pascal Locat

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsMinistère des TransportsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn situGeologyGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Spreads are a type of landslide in sensitive clay, characterized by horsts and grabens that develop over long, quasi-horizontal shear band due to strain-softening and progressive failure. It is not yet understood what causes the initiation of the horizontal shear band, nor why its direction of propagation is approximately horizontal. The paper suggests that initiation of a horizontal shear band is more likely in deposits that have a high capacity for horizontal unloading in the overlying soil mass without mobilizing active failure relative to the direct simple shear undrained shear strength along the potential shear band. Using the 1994 spread at Sainte-Monique-de-Nicolet, two parametric studies are described studying the influence of various soil strength parameters on the ratio of available horizontal unloading to direct simple shear strength as well as the influence of this ratio on mobilized stresses following a horizontal unloading. The results of a recent phase of geotechnical investigation, used to identify soil input parameters, are described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207