Numerical Modelling of In Situ Stresses to Investigate the Initiation of Spreads in Sensitive Clay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Spreads are a type of landslide in sensitive clay, characterized by horsts and grabens that develop over long, quasi-horizontal shear band due to strain-softening and progressive failure. It is not yet understood what causes the initiation of the horizontal shear band, nor why its direction of propagation is approximately horizontal. The paper suggests that initiation of a horizontal shear band is more likely in deposits that have a high capacity for horizontal unloading in the overlying soil mass without mobilizing active failure relative to the direct simple shear undrained shear strength along the potential shear band. Using the 1994 spread at Sainte-Monique-de-Nicolet, two parametric studies are described studying the influence of various soil strength parameters on the ratio of available horizontal unloading to direct simple shear strength as well as the influence of this ratio on mobilized stresses following a horizontal unloading. The results of a recent phase of geotechnical investigation, used to identify soil input parameters, are described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".