Resilience Processes Through Religiosity/Spirituality and Coping in a Sample of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Religiosity/Spirituality (RS) has been shown to be related to reduced distress following life threatening and stressful events. However, the study of RS and mental health has been confounded by its overlap with positive coping and well-being. The current study sought to extend current knowledge by examining the impact of RS on depressive and somatic symptoms and post-traumatic growth (PTG) through positive and negative coping in a sample of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC). Online cross-sectional data were collected from 912 participants, primarily in Canada & the United States. Parallel mediation findings showed that RS predicted decreased negative coping which in turn predicted decreased symptoms. For PTG, findings supported partial mediation, with RS predicting increased positive coping and subsequent increased PTG, whilst RS continued to directly predict PTG after mediation. Findings suggest multiple-resilience processes through which RS contributes to improved mental health in BIPOC communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".