MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412927430 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaf062

Severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in infants aged 60 days or less (2025 to 2027)

2025· article· en· W4412927430 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael Sgro, Sloane Freeman, Saisujani Rasiah, Douglas Campbell, Vibhuti Shah

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3-day-old male infant, born at 38 weeks’ gestation via spontaneous vaginal delivery, presents to the emergency department with poor feeding, lethargy and a high-pitched cry. He was discharged from the hospital at 12 h of life without a documented bilirubin level but with a plan for follow-up. He is exclusively breastfed, has bruising on the scalp from a vacuum-assisted delivery, and is of East Asian descent. Upon examination, the infant is jaundiced, hypotonic and intermittently arching his back. A stat serum total bilirubin is 460 µmol/L. The conjugated bilirubin is 12 µmol/L. Additional laboratory results reveal mother’s blood type (O+) and her Direct Antiglobulin Test was positive. The infant is transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit for urgent double-volume exchange transfusion. The patient is placed under phototherapy while preparations are made for exchange transfusion. Upon review, predischarge bilirubin screening was not performed, and follow-up was scheduled for day 5 of life. Antibody screen on cord blood was not performed. Additional risk factors included early discharge, jaundice in the first 24 h, exclusive breastfeeding and a cephalohematoma. This case meets the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP) case definition for severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. It illustrates the need for systematic bilirubin screening, early recognition of risk factors and timely follow-up—issues the 2025 revised Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) guidelines aim to address.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207