MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412928969 · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101120

MR1-ligand cross-linking identifies vitamin B6 metabolites as TCR-reactive antigens

2025· article· en· W4412928969 on OpenAlexaff
Thierry Schmidlin, Enas M. Behiry, Hannah Thomas, Garry Dolton, Fabio Marino, Samiul Hasan, Magdaléna von Essen, Rose M. Gathungu, Barbara Steigenberger, Hayden Selvadurai, Joseph Dukes, Paul E. Brennan, O. Brad Spiller, Jonathan D. Silk, Andrew K. Sewell, Nicola Ternette

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Methods · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungCardiff University
KeywordsChemistryLigand (biochemistry)AntigenT-cell receptorVitamin b6Reactive oxygen speciesBiochemistryImmunologyMedicineVitaminReceptorT cellImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major histocompatibility complex class I-related protein 1 (MR1) plays a central role in the immune recognition of infected cells and can mediate T cell detection of cancer. Knowledge of the nature of the ligands presented by MR1 is still sparse and has been limited by a lack of efficient approaches for MR1 ligand discovery. Here, we present a cross-linking strategy to investigate Schiff base-bound MR1 ligands. Our methodology employs reductive amination to stabilize the labile Schiff base bond between MR1 and its ligand, allowing for the detection of ligands as covalent MR1 adducts by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. We apply our approach to identifying vitamin B6 vitamers pyridoxal and pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) as MR1 ligands and show that both compounds are recognized by T cells expressing either A-F7, a mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cell T cell receptor (TCR), or MC.7.G5, an MR1-restricted TCR reported to recognize cancer cells, highlighting them as immunogenic MR1 ligands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Reports MethodsSame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207