Anteroposterior Diameter Is Associated with Conversion from Right Minithoracotomy to Median Sternotomy in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) via right minithoracotomy is a safe, reproducible approach with excellent outcomes and reduced costs compared to median sternotomy. Despite careful patient selection, conversion to sternotomy occurs in 1–3% of cases and is associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality. Small body habitus, particularly a short anteroposterior (AP) diameter, may increase the risk of conversion, but this has not been previously studied. This study aims to identify preoperative factors associated with conversion to improve patient selection for MICS. As cardiovascular surgery becomes increasingly personalized, identifying anatomical factors that predict technical complexity is essential. Methods: This retrospective study included 254 adult patients who underwent elective MICS between 2015 and 2024 at a tertiary hospital. Patient characteristics, computed tomography (CT) scans, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. AP diameter was defined as the distance from the posterior sternum to the anterior vertebral body at the mitral valve level on CT. Statistical analyses included Mann−Whitney and Fisher’s exact/chi-square tests. Results: Conversion to sternotomy occurred in 1.6% of patients (n = 4). All converted patients were female. The converted group had a significantly shorter median AP diameter (100 mm vs. 124 mm, p = 0.020). Conversion was associated with higher rates of stroke and infection (25.0% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.047 for both), but no significant differences in hospital stay, bleeding, or renal failure. Conclusions: An AP diameter of less than 100 mm was associated with a higher risk of conversion to sternotomy in MICS. Incorporating simple, reproducible preoperative imaging metrics into surgical planning may advance precision-guided cardiac surgery and optimize patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".