Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) Gene with Periodontal Disease—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Implications for Personalized Dentistry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Genetic polymorphisms in the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene may contribute to individual susceptibility to periodontal disease. A meta-analysis assessed the association between three COX-2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) namely, −765 G/C (rs20417), −1195 G/A (rs689466), and 8473 T/C (rs5275), and the risk of CP. Methods: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of five electronic databases and additional sources. The eligible studies were observational (case–control or cohort) with genotypic data comparing individuals with periodontal disease and periodontally healthy controls. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), and the certainty of evidence was evaluated via the GRADE framework. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated under dominant genetic models. Results: Seven studies (n = 1467 participants) met the inclusion criteria. No eligible studies evaluated the 8473 T/C SNP. The meta-analysis of the −765 G/C variant revealed a significant association with periodontal disease (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.12–2.32, p = 0.03; I2 = 0%). For the −1195 G/A variant, the pooled OR was 1.86 (95% CI: 1.00–3.43, p = 0.05; I2 = 35%), suggesting a borderline significant association. The certainty of evidence was graded as moderate for −765 G/C and low for −1195 G/A. Conclusions: The COX-2 −765 G/C polymorphism is significantly associated with increased CP risk, while the −1195 G/A variant shows a potential, though less certain, link. Larger, high-quality studies using standardized classifications are needed to confirm these associations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".