MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412931079 · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006813

An IV Sodium Bicarbonate Shortage in the Critically Ill: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis

2025· article· en· W4412931079 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amanda Y. Leong, Andrea Soo, Andrew Bond, Hannah Wunsch, Danny J. Zuege, Sean M. Bagshaw, Henry T. Stelfox, Daniel J. Niven

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal function and acid-base balance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeSodium bicarbonateBicarbonateEmergency medicinePopulationEconomic shortageCritically illIntensive care medicineInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine effects of the 2017 worldwide shortage of IV sodium bicarbonate on outcomes of critically ill adults with acidemia. DESIGN: Interrupted time-series analysis. SETTING: Seventeen adult ICUs in Alberta, Canada. PATIENTS: Adults (≥ 18 yr) with blood pH value of less than 7.3, admitted to study ICUs between June 1, 2015, and 31 December 2019. INTERVENTIONS: The 2017 sodium bicarbonate shortage occurred between 8 June and October 4, 2017. Our health authority enacted emergency conservation measures during this time. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main data source was eCritical Alberta, a population-based ICU Registry. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients treated with IV sodium bicarbonate. Outcomes were examined via segmented regression. Among 18,865 admissions, median age was 62 years (interquartile range [IQR] 50-71), median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II was 23 (IQR 18-30), and 39.6% were female. Immediately after start of the shortage, patients treated with bicarbonate decreased from 29.3% to 21.5% (absolute -7.8%; 95% CI, -12.8 to -2.8%). During the shortage bicarbonate recipients more likely had pH less than or equal to 7.20 (78.8% vs. 69.0%, p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis among those with pH less than or equal to 7.20 who did not receive bicarbonate during the shortage suggested increased proportion treated with vasopressors (9.9%; 95% CI, 2.4-17.4%) and continuous renal replacement therapy (8.6%; 95% CI, 0.6-16.6%). Similar trends were observed among those with renal sequential organ failure assessment greater than or equal to 3 who did not receive bicarbonate during the shortage. There was no change in ICU length of stay or mortality in overall population or subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency conservation measures that accompanied a worldwide shortage of IV sodium bicarbonate were associated with a reduction in IV sodium bicarbonate use among critically ill patients with acidemia. This was not linked to changes in survival or length of stay outcomes. Future bicarbonate research should focus on subgroups such as those with severe acidemia and/or advanced renal insufficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicRenal function and acid-base balanceFrench-language works237,207