MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412940313 · doi:10.1136/jitc-2024-010777

Nemvaleukin alfa monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase 1/2 non-randomized ARTISTRY-1 trial

2025· article· en· W4412940313 on OpenAlexaff
Emiliano Calvo, Valentina Boni, Olivier Dumas, Sang Joon Shin, Seth Rosen, Arvind Chaudhry, Philip R. Debruyne, Xiaomin He, Ulka N. Vaishampayan, David F. McDermott

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabRenal cell carcinomaMelanomaPharmacodynamicsInternal medicinePharmacokineticsClinical endpointOncologyAdverse effectResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsPhases of clinical researchCancerClinical trialGastroenterologyImmunotherapyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Despite improved outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and their combinations in advanced solid tumors, a subset of patients remains unresponsive or progresses, highlighting an unmet need for novel treatments with durable benefit. Nemvaleukin alfa (nemvaleukin, ALKS 4230) demonstrated manageable safety and antitumor activity, alone and in combination with pembrolizumab, across heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors in the ARTISTRY-1 study. We report in-depth antitumor activity, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of nemvaleukin monotherapy at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cohorts from ARTISTRY-1. Methods ARTISTRY-1 was a three-part (A, B, and C), multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 study. Adult patients who had received prior treatment, including ICIs, and had advanced melanoma or RCC were enrolled in Part B. Patients received intravenous nemvaleukin once daily on days 1–5 (21-day cycle) at 6 µg/kg/day (RP2D determined from Part A). Primary endpoints for Part B were overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures. Results From July 2016 to March 2023, 74 patients in Part B received nemvaleukin monotherapy (melanoma, n=47; RCC, n=27). ORR in melanoma and RCC cohorts was 9% (95% CI, 2% to 21%; n=4) and 14% (95% CI, 3% to 35%; n=3), respectively; disease control rate was 50% (95% CI, 35% to 65%; n=23) and 50% (95% CI, 28% to 72%, n=11), respectively, with stable disease ≥6 months observed in 3 (7%) and 2 (9%) patients, respectively. The most common nemvaleukin-related treatment-emergent adverse event of grade 3–4 was neutropenia (melanoma, n=27 (57%); RCC, n=9 (33%)). No patients in either cohort experienced grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of cytokine release syndrome or infusion-related reaction. There were no reported capillary leak syndrome TEAEs. Pharmacokinetic parameters for extent and duration of nemvaleukin exposure were similar between the two cohorts. Increases in peripheral CD8 + T-cell and natural killer cell populations from baseline were similar between the two cohorts, with minimal changes in regulatory T cells observed. Conclusions Nemvaleukin demonstrated pharmacodynamic proof of mechanism, with single-agent antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with advanced melanoma and RCC. Trial registration number NCT02799095 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207