MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412951898 · doi:10.1177/00961442251359182

Race and Place in Asian American History, 1950-present HumTarryHaydukRonPierre-LouisFrancoisJrKrasnerMichael Alan (eds.) (2021). Immigrant Crossroads: Globalization, Incorporation, and Placemaking in Queens, New York. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 362 + xiii pp., illustrations, tables, contributors, index, $42.95 (paper), $115.50 (cloth), $42.95 (ebook).KimHeidi (2021). Illegal Immigrants / Model Minorities: The Cold War of Chinese American Narrative. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 185 + viii pp., illustrations, notes, bibliography, index, $34.95 (paper).LiuMichael (2020). Forever Struggle: Activism, Identity, & Survival in Boston’s Chinatown, 1880-2018. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 206 + xii pp., $26.95 (paper), $90.00 (cloth).ZarsadiazJames (2022). Resisting Change in Suburbia: Asian Immigrants and Frontier Nostalgia in L.A. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, xiv + 195 pp., notes, bibliography, index, maps. $85.00 (hardcover), $29.95 (paper), $29.95 (ebook).

2025· article· en· W4412951898 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Megan Asaka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Urban History · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of OxfordPrinceton UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaMcGill UniversityYork UniversityTemple University
KeywordsPlacemakingImmigrationRace (biology)TempleSociologyAnthropologyGerontologyReligious studiesHistoryGender studiesAncient historyPhilosophyArchaeologyArchitectureMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chinese American Narrative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Urban HistorySame topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207