ALSUntangled #80: ISRIB (Integrated stress response InhiBitor)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ALSUntangled reviews alternative and off-label treatments for people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PALS). Here we assess ISRIB, a molecule that attenuates the integrated stress response (ISR). The ISR is an intracellular signaling network through which cells normally respond to stress, but in ALS it appears to be overactive, leading to the formation of "stress granules" which some but not all investigators believe can triggerapoptotic cell death. ISRIB can attenuate the formation of these stress granules while still allowing parts of protein synthesis to continue. Pre-clinical data demonstrate that ISRIB is beneficial in cell models of ALS. A small number of patients taking ISRIB in Spain report symptomatic improvements with little or no side effects, though we have not been able to independently verify these benefits. There are no clinical trials evaluating ISRIB in any condition and questions about its solubility and bioavailability have arisen. Currently, we do not have enough evidence to endorse the use of ISRIB for treating ALS. We support further research in disease models and clinical trials to study pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".