Apatite in situ Lu-Hf and U-Pb geochronology in layered mafic intrusions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Layered Mafic Intrusions (LMI) represent the solidified remnants of basaltic magma chambers and provide important insights for understanding subsurface igneous processes, including those linked to the formation of economic deposits of Fe-Ni-Cu-Co sulphides, platinum group elements (PGE), Cr-Fe-Ti-V-oxides and apatite. However, constraining the timing of emplacement of LMI can be challenging, as datable minerals like zircon have a relatively low abundance in mafic rocks. In this study, we use apatite, a common accessory mineral in mafic rocks that can reach high modal abundances in the most evolved parts of LMI to evaluate the robustness of the in-situ U-Pb and Lu-Hf dating methods by laser ablation – inductively coupled plasma – reaction cell mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS/MS) for constraining the timing of LMI petrogenesis. We present in-situ apatite U-Pb and Lu-Hf dates from apatite-rich lithologies from four major LMI localities: the Fe-Ti Boulder Lake North deposit (Duluth Complex, USA), the Upper Zone (Bushveld Complex, South Africa), the Nebo-Babel Intrusion (Giles Complex, Musgrave Province, Australia), and the Proterozoic anorthosite massifs of the Grader Intrusion and Lac Perron deposit (Grenville Province, Canada). Trace element discrimination plots, coupled with petrological data, indicate that apatite from all four localities exhibit typical mafic compositions and are classified as cumulus apatite. The U-Pb dates in apatite either represent primary magmatic ages or exhibit varying degrees of Pb-loss, as seen in the Nebo-Babel intrusion, and in the Bushveld Complex, where the degree of Pb loss is dependent on apatite crystal size. In contrast, the apatite Lu-Hf system is undisturbed and records primary LMI crystallisation ages as demonstrated for the Duluth and Bushveld Complexes, and Nebo-Babel intrusion. In the Grenville Province, the long-lived magmatic systems likely record younger apatite growth ages compared to zircon ages. Hence, this study demonstrates in-situ LA-ICP-MS/MS Lu-Hf of apatite as a robust tool for obtaining primary magmatic ages of LMI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".