MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412981216 · doi:10.1016/j.heha.2025.100141

Global relevant concentration of emerging contaminants: species sensitivity distributions and ecological risks to aquatic organisms – a comprehensive data synthesis

2025· article· en· W4412981216 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Md. Kamrul Hossain, Mst. Arjumoni Anu, Mohammad Omar Faruk Molla, M S Jahan, S Asha, Rafiquel Islam

Bibliographic record

VenueHygiene and Environmental Health Advances · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceContaminationEcologyEnvironmental chemistryAquatic ecosystemSensitivity (control systems)BiologyChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emerging contaminants (ECs) are inadequately monitored or unregulated chemicals that pose growing threats to aquatic ecosystems due to their biological effects on organisms. This study provides a global overview of EC concentrations, species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), and associated ecological risks. We analysed global EC concentrations using comprehensive secondary datasets and applied multivariate statistical techniques such as One-way PERMANOVA and Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (nMDS) to assess contaminant patterns worldwide. SSDs and Risk Quotients (RQs) were used to evaluate species-level sensitivities and ecological risk. Findings reveal considerable global variation in EC concentrations. Morocco reported the highest levels of estrogens (E1, E2), Australia in Estriol (E3), and Bangladesh in pesticides (DDT, Diazinon, Heptachlor). Canada showed peak Bisphenol A (BPA) levels, while China and Japan led in PFOS and PFOA, respectively. The Netherlands and Argentina showed elevated levels of surfactants and pharmaceuticals. PERMANOVA results (F = 1.677, p = 0.10) indicate no significant overall group differences; however, pairwise tests revealed notable distinctions, especially among estrogens, microplastics, and pesticides. nMDS analysis showed clearer clustering by region than chemical class. SSDs highlighted varying sensitivities of aquatic species based on chemical-specific NOECs (µg/L). Elevated RQs were observed in Morocco, China, Bangladesh, and Turkey, with Spain, Japan, and Singapore showing high RQs for surfactants and microplastics. These findings underscore the urgency of incorporating SSD and RQ data into regulatory frameworks to set protective concentration thresholds. Ongoing research is vital to address chronic and sub-lethal effects, supporting evidence-based policymaking and enhanced treatment and risk management strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0130.015
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHygiene and Environmental Health AdvancesSame topicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFrench-language works237,207