MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Machine learning uncovers provenance of source rocks for volcano-sedimentary lithium mineralization in South China

2025· article· en· W4412983444 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rui Su, Yongjie Lin, Wenhui Huang, Simon M. Jowitt, Francesco Putzolu

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChina Geological SurveyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
KeywordsProvenanceGeologyGeochemistryMineralization (soil science)Sedimentary rockVolcanoChinaVolcanic rockEarth scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Early to Middle Triassic sedimentary units in South China, belonging to the so-called ”Green bean rock” (hereafter ”GBR”), host significant volumes of potentially economic clay-type volcano-sedimentary lithium (Li) mineralization. However, the source material and the processes that led to the enrichment of Li in these clay deposits remain unclear. This is especially true of the uncertain provenance of the igneous material that eventually forms this Li mineralization. In this study we apply machine learning to geochemical data from igneous rocks and GBR samples to determine the nature of the source rock, the type and source of the magma associated with the GBR, and the initial Li contents of these protoliths. The results of this Random Forest (RF) modeling indicate that the GBR protolith was entirely derived from a dacitic magma, whereas the petrology of these samples indicate that the source magma for the GBR protolith was derived from an intermediate to acidic dacite-rhyolite magma. The RF modeling suggests the protolith volcanic ash was primarily derived from the Sanjiang Orogenic Belt and the Shiwandashan Belt in South China. The location and distribution of the GBR relative to the Sanjiang Orogenic Belt and the Shiwandashan Belt indicates that the GBR has a significant directionality with preferential NE-SW and N-S orientations, indicating the likely influence of paleomonsoon conditions during GBR formation. The Li content of the GBR protolith is <50 ppm, with 68.75% of the data generated during this study having a Li concentration of <20 ppm, indicating that the Li within the GBR was primarily derived from water-rock interactions during the deposition period. This study provides new insights into the process involved in the formation of the GBR and the associated lithium enrichments in this region as well as outlining the value in integrating machine learning models with big data in mineral deposit research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207