MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412985034 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3595949

Multi-Authorized, Privacy-Protected, and Traceable Driverless Taxi Data Sharing in Internet of Vehicles

2025· article· en· W4412985034 on OpenAlexaff
Yanwei Gong, Xiaolin Chang, Jelena Mišić, Vojislav B. Mišić

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInformation privacyThe InternetComputer securityComputer scienceInternet of ThingsInternet privacyPrivacy softwareBusinessWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced wireless communication and artificial intelligence technologies are significantly facilitating the deployment of driverless taxis (DTs). To ensure high-quality of DT services, data sharing among DTs is essential during service provision. However, at least three key challenges are then raised in terms of security and privacy: 1) guaranteeing data authenticity with traceability; 2) enabling flexible data authorization and preserving privacy amid complex data ownership; and 3) protecting DT privacy under frequent data sharing. Most existing works address only one aspect, such as data authenticity, privacy preservation, or single-entity authorization. To address these challenges, we propose a novel <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">M</i>ulti-authorized, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">P</i>rivacy-protected, and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">T</i>raceable <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D</i>ata <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">S</i>haring (MPTDS) scheme for DTs. Firstly, MPTDS upholds data privacy preservation by designing the data sharing credential for each DT and the data access credential for each service provider. Data sharing credential also ensures anonymity and unlinkability of DTs. Secondly, MPTDS ensures data integrity and origin authentication by designing the credential-based authentication technique for DT, which also enables the traceability. Additionally, MPTDS facilitates the data multi-authorization by designing the data sharing credential multi-party issuance technique without sacrificing the non-frameabiltiy. We conduct security analyses and performance evaluations to validate the security properties and practicality of MPTDS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and EngineeringSame topicBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFrench-language works237,207