MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412985265 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.24.00920

Cement Mantle Screws in Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Fixation Near Well-Fixed Femoral Stems May Not Impact Short-Term Femoral Stem Survivorship

2025· article· en· W4412985265 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James C. Shaw, Ruby G. Patel, Peter K. Sculco, Joshua Wright-Chisem, Naomi E. Gadinsky, Craig E. Klinger, David L. Helfet, Dean G. Lorich, David S. Wellman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriprostheticMedicineSurgeryFixation (population genetics)DentistryProsthesisArthroplastyFemoral fractureFemurPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Vancouver Type-B1 and C periprosthetic hip fractures have traditionally been treated using single- or double-plate fixation constructs. Concern exists regarding screws within the cement mantle due to the theoretical risk of cement fracture and eventual prosthetic loosening. The aim of this study was to assess femoral stem survivorship in patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C fractures around a well-fixed cemented femoral component who were treated with a plate construct and screws into the cement mantle. The hypothesis was that screw fixation into the cement mantle would not compromise stem fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who were consecutively, surgically treated for a periprosthetic fracture around a femoral stem by 3 surgeons, as identified through a search of records from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2023. A total of 112 consecutive patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C periprosthetic femoral fractures treated at our institutions were reviewed. Patients who underwent fixation using plate constructs with ≥1 screw within the cement mantle around the stem were included. Patients were followed until union, revision due to plate construct failure, or stem revision. Other complications, including alignment loss, cemented stem subsidence, radiographic stem loosening, and new cement-mantle fractures, were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (19 female; 27 White or Caucasian; 3 Hispanic or Latino; mean age, 81.4 ± 8.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Radiographic union was achieved in 26 patients (92.9%). The study included 8 (28.6%) interprosthetic fractures between a total hip arthroplasty prosthesis and a total knee arthroplasty prosthesis. The mean union time was 8.0 ± 4.6 months (range, 2.2 to 25.6 weeks). The mean follow-up duration following the index procedure was 33.3 ± 24.0 months (range, 6.1 to 86.2 months). Two nonunions occurred (7.1%), both involving plate failure. Both patients required revision of the femoral prosthesis, which was not loose at the time of reoperation. No stem subsidence or cement mantle fractures occurred during follow-up, and no revisions were performed for stem loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Screw fixation into cement around a well-fixed stem did not contribute to stem loosening at short-term follow-up. There were no isolated femoral component revisions for cement mantle issues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Joint SurgerySame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207