MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412988450 · doi:10.1007/s11657-025-01541-4

Longitudinal bone loss in the paretic leg and its contributing factors in individuals with chronic stroke: a 2-year prospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4412988450 on OpenAlexaff
Huixi Ouyang, Tiev Miller, Ling Qin, Michael Ying, Vivian Hung, Thomas Leung, Marco Y.C. Pang

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Osteoporosis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHong Kong Polytechnic University
KeywordsMedicineQuantitative computed tomographyStroke (engine)Bone mineralTibiaOrthopedic surgeryCohortProspective cohort studyBone densityInternal medicineSurgeryCardiologyPhysical therapyOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-stroke fracture risk necessitates investigation of bone properties and contributing factors. The decline in paretic tibia failure load post-stroke was attributed to decreased trabecular bone density and thickness at 2-year follow-up. Less decline in bone strength was associated with better leg blood flow, walking speed, strength, and activity at baseline. PURPOSE: To delineate long-term changes in distal tibia bone properties after stroke and identify their associated factors. METHODS: High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) scans of the bilateral distal tibia were performed in 46 chronic stroke participants (age, 60.4 ± 7.8 years; post-stroke onset, 6.3 ± 4.2 years) and 45 controls (age, 57.7 ± 6.3 years) at baseline and 2 years later. We measured the change in the estimated failure load (indicator of bone strength), volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), geometry, and microstructure. Blood flow volume of the popliteal artery, muscle strength, sensory function, and gait speed were also assessed. RESULTS: In the paretic leg of stroke participants, a significant decline in estimated failure load was observed (- 3.39%, p < 0.01), which was greater than that of the non-paretic side (- 1.93%, p < 0.01) and controls (- 1.89 to - 2.18%, p < 0.05). The deterioration in estimated failure load was accompanied by a decline in trabecular vBMD and thickness. Greater arterial blood flow, higher walking velocity, better muscle strength, and higher physical activity level at baseline at 2-year follow-up portended less decline in estimated failure load. CONCLUSIONS: During the 2-year follow-up, there was a decline in estimated failure load of the paretic distal tibia among people with chronic stroke, attributed to a decreased trabecular density and thickness. Greater decline in estimated tibial bone strength was associated with lower arterial blood flow volume and motor function on the paretic side.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of OsteoporosisSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207