MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412990395 · doi:10.56952/arma-2025-0919

Subsurface Storage Technological Advancements & Innovation for Hydrogen (SUSTAIN H2)

2025· article· en· W4412990395 on OpenAlexaff
Shadi Salahshoor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsGeomembrane Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen storageHydrogenComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: The Sustain H2 program is a cross-functional initiative focused on accelerating the safe and sustainable adoption of Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) - a critical enabler for long-duration, low-carbon energy storage. While hydrogen is gaining momentum across transportation and industry, large-scale storage remains a challenge. Sustain H2 targets porous rock formations, which make up 80% of global subsurface storage potential, yet remain underutilized compared to salt caverns. By integrating advanced reservoir simulations, experimental testing, and techno-economic analysis, the program is building a robust framework to evaluate site feasibility, control hydrogen migration, and ensure operational safety and regulatory compliance. This talk The Sustain H2 program is a collaborative initiative aimed at promoting the safe and sustainable adoption of Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS), which is essential for long-duration, low-carbon energy storage. Although hydrogen is becoming increasingly important in transportation and industry, large-scale storage poses a challenge. Sustain H2 focuses on utilizing porous rock formations, which account for 80% of the global potential for subsurface storage, yet are currently underutilized compared to salt caverns. By combining advanced reservoir simulations, experimental testing, and techno-economic analysis, the program is developing a comprehensive framework to assess site feasibility, manage hydrogen migration, and ensure both operational safety and regulatory compliance. This talk will introduce Sustain H2’s vision and recent advancements while highlighting opportunities for collaboration across sectors to unlock the next frontier in hydrogen storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207