MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Systematic framework for deep learning-based predictive injection control with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization for a hydrogen/diesel dual-fuel engine

2025· article· en· W4412991508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueControl Engineering Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsHyperparameterDual (grammatical number)Bayesian optimizationDiesel fuelBayesian probabilityMachine learningComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change and global warming concerns promote interest in alternative fuels, especially zero-carbon fuels like hydrogen. Modifying existing combustion engines for dual-fuel operation can decrease emissions of vehicles that are already on the road. The procedure of a deep learning-based model predictive control as a machine learning implementation, practical for complex nonlinear systems with input and state constraints, has been developed and tested on a hydrogen/diesel dual-fuel (HDDF) engine application. A nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) utilizing a deep neural network (DNN) process model is proposed to control the injected hydrogen and diesel. This DNN model has eight inputs and four outputs and has a short computational time compared to the physics-based model. The architecture and hyperparameters of the DNN model of the HDDF process are optimized through a two-stage Bayesian optimization to achieve high accuracy while minimizing the complexity of the model described. The final DNN architecture has two hidden layers with 31 and 23 neurons. A modified engine capable of HDDF operation is compared to standard diesel operation to evaluate the engine performance and emissions. During experimental engine testing, the controller required an average computational time of 2 ms per cycle on a low-cost processor, satisfying the real-time requirements, and was faster than recurrent networks. The control performance of the DNN-NMPC for the HDDF engine showed a mean absolute error of 0.19 bar in load tracking while maximizing average hydrogen energy share (68%) and reducing emissions. Specifically, the particulate matter emissions decrease by 87% compared to diesel operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it