Numerical Modeling of Expansive Soil Behavior Using an Effective Stress-Based Constitutive Relationship for Unsaturated Soils
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have extensively applied the generalized consolidation theory, which incorporates a two-stress state variable framework, to predict the volumetric behavior of unsaturated expansive soils under varying mechanical stress and matric suction. A key requirement for this approach is a constitutive surface that links the soil void ratio to both net stress and matric suction. A large number of fitting parameters are typically needed to accurately fit a two-variable void ratio surface equation to laboratory test data. In this study, a single-stress state variable framework was adopted to describe the void ratio as a function of effective stress for unsaturated soils. The proposed approach was applied to fit void ratio–effective stress constitutive curves to laboratory test data for two different expansive clays. Additionally, a finite element model coupling variably saturated flow and stress–strain analysis was developed to simulate the volume change behavior of expansive clay subjected to moisture fluctuations. The model utilizes suction stress to compute the effective stress field and incorporates the dependency of soil modulus on volumetric water content based on the proposed void ratio–effective stress relationship. The developed numerical model was validated against a benchmark problem in which a layer of Regina expansive clay was subjected to a constant infiltration rate. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model in simulating expansive soil deformations under varying moisture conditions over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it