Novel Lipid Biomarkers of Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology Based on Urinary Small Extracellular Vesicles: A Pilot Study of Sugar Cane Workers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDu) disproportionately affects young male agricultural workers who are otherwise healthy. There is a scarcity of biomarkers for early detection of this type of kidney disease. We hypothesized that small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) released into urine may provide novel biomarkers. METHODS: We obtained two urine samples at the start and the end of a workday in the fields from a limited set of workers with and without kidney impairment. Isolated sEVs were characterized for size, surface marker expression, and purity and, subsequently, their lipid composition was determined by mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The number of particles per ml of urine normalized to osmolality and the size variance were larger in workers with possible CKDu than in control workers. Surface markers CD9, CD63, and CD81 are characteristic of sEVs and a second set of surface markers suggested the kidney as the origin. Differential expression of CD25 and CD45 suggested early inflammation in CKDu workers. Of the twenty-one lipids differentially expressed, several were bioactive, suggesting that they may have essential functions. Remarkably, fourteen of the lipids showed intermediate expression values in sEVs from healthy individuals with acute creatinine increases after a day of work. CONCLUSIONS: We identified twenty-one possible lipid biomarkers in sEVs isolated from urine that may be able to distinguish agricultural workers with early onset of CKDu. Differentially expressed surface proteins in these sEVs suggested early-stage inflammation. This pilot study was limited in the number of workers evaluated, but the approach should be further evaluated in a larger population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".