MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413003782 · doi:10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100448

Integrated field characterization and static hydrocarbon reserve estimation of the Penobscot Field, Nova Scotia, Canada

2025· article· en· W4413003782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed Eleslambouly, Tarek Khalifa, Omar Aldhanhani, Mursal Zeynalli, Ahmed Abdelmaksoud

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Geoscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKhalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
KeywordsNova scotiaField (mathematics)Nova (rocket)Environmental scienceGeographyArchaeologyEngineeringMathematicsAeronautics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Penobscot Field, located within the Scotian Basin offshore Nova Scotia, Canada, represents an underexplored hydrocarbon field with potential for future development. Previous studies have been confined to specific reservoir intervals without integrating multiple stratigraphic levels, and a comprehensive static reservoir characterization and volumetric assessment of the Penobscot Field has yet to be undertaken, constraining its full development evaluation. This study presents a comprehensive characterization of the field by integrating geological, geophysical, and petrophysical datasets, leading to static hydrocarbon reserve estimation. The workflow involves seismic interpretation, structural modeling, petrophysical evaluation, and static volumetric calculations. Seismic analysis revealed a structurally complex setting dominated by normal and inverted faults, with reservoir intervals primarily within the Missisauga Formation, which is subdivided into upper, middle, and lower units. Petrophysical evaluation from well logs and core data identified key reservoir properties, including porosity ranging from 12 % to 28 %, permeability spanning from 1 to 1000 mD, and variable water saturations. Stochastic modeling of facies and petrophysical attributes provided insights into lateral and vertical heterogeneity. The Penobscot Field's original oil-in-place ranges from 41.6 × 10 6 m 3 to 109.7 × 10 6 m 3 , with the Middle Missisauga sands presenting the highest reservoir potential. Fault seal analysis indicated predominantly sealing behavior in the shallow sections and semi-permeable conditions at greater depths, suggesting potential lateral migration pathways. The results underscore the field's hydrocarbon potential while emphasizing the significance of structural complexity, facies distribution, and petrophysical variability in reservoir quality, as well as its potential for future development or utilization of similar sand reservoirs for CO 2 storage utilization. This work provides the first fully integrated static reservoir model of the Penobscot Field, offering critical insights for delineating the hydrocarbon reservoirs potential and future production strategies in the Scotian Basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy GeoscienceSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207