Cerebral Hemodynamics as a Diagnostic Bridge Between Mild Cognitive Impairment and Late-Life Depression: A Multimodal Approach Using Transcranial Doppler and MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a shared contributor to both cognitive impairment and late-life depression (LLD). However, the combined diagnostic value of cerebral hemodynamics, neuroimaging markers, and neuropsychological outcomes remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the associations be-tween transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound parameters, cognitive performance, and depressive symptoms in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and LLD. Importantly, we evaluated the integrative value of TCD-derived indices alongside MRI-confirmed white matter lesions (WMLs) and standardized neurocognitive and affective assessments. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 96 older adults were enrolled including 78 cognitively unimpaired individuals and 18 with MCI. All participants underwent structured clinical, neuropsychological, and imaging evaluations including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), MRI-based Fazekas scoring of WMLs, and TCD ultrasonography of the middle cerebral artery. Hemodynamic variables included mean blood flow velocity (MBFV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsatility index (PI), and resistive index (RI). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to identify independent predictors of MCI. RESULTS: < 0.01) remained independently associated with MCI. ROC analysis revealed excellent discriminative performance for RI (AUC = 0.919) and MBFV (AUC = 0.879). Furthermore, PI correlated positively with depressive symptom severity, while RI was inversely related to the GDS-15 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the diagnostic utility of TCD-derived hemodynamic parameters-particularly RI and MBFV-in identifying early vascular contributions to cognitive and affective dysfunction in older adults. The integration of TCD with MRI-confirmed WML assessment and standardized cognitive/mood measures represents a novel and clinically practical multi-modal approach for neurovascular profiling in aging populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".