Is amyotrophic lateral sclerosis less severe in mice than in humans?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review here novel knock-in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). RECENT FINDINGS: Knock-in mouse models of various familial forms of ALS generally display a mild motor phenotype, with limited progression, that do not recapitulate the full-blown clinical picture of ALS. SUMMARY: ALS is a devastating neurodegenerative disease in humans. Typically manifesting in the fifth or sixth decade of life, ALS leads to progressive motor dysfunction and death, usually within 2-5 years from symptom onset. A subset of ALS cases are dominantly inherited. Over the last 30 years, multiple mouse models of ALS have been generated, and recent advances in mouse genome editing techniques have enabled the generation of mouse strains carrying orthologous mutations in endogenous genes that mirror those causing familial forms of ALS. Intriguingly, many of these knock-in mouse models develop much milder phenotypes than patients with ALS carrying the same mutations. A full-blown ALS clinical phenotype seems to be only elicited upon overexpression of mutant genes beyond the endogenous levels. Here, we review these novel models and argue that these models could represent how ALS manifests in the mouse species. We also evaluate how these models could be used for characterizing mechanisms and preclinical drug evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".