Toward sustainable steel bridge maintenance: anti-corrosion coating systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The paper examines the significance of anti-corrosion coating systems for steel bridges within transportation networks, with a particular focus on their long-term sustainability. The study assesses the long-term sustainability of four coating systems, analyzing their performance, cost, and environmental impact over a hypothetical 75-year bridge lifespan. Key considerations include the service life of each coating system, the frequency and extent of maintenance required, the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and the broader social costs, such as public inconvenience due to maintenance activities. The research presents detailed data, equations for estimating costs, and methodologies for sustainability analysis in varying corrosive environments (C2, C3, and C5). The findings underscore the necessity of selecting low-VOC materials to minimize environmental impact, while also considering the efficacy of corrosion protection and the associated social impacts. This comprehensive approach aims to guide stakeholders in selecting the most sustainable corrosion protection strategies, ensuring relevance in diverse and evolving environmental and societal contexts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".