MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413020479 · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2025.08.006

OrbitTrack: Advanced RSO detection and tracking from wide field-of-view on-orbit images

2025· article· en· W4413020479 on OpenAlexafffund
Yeonjeong Jeong, Vithurshan Suthakar, Randa Qashoa, Gunho Sohn, Regina S. K. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Space Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsTracking (education)Orbit (dynamics)Remote sensingComputer scienceField (mathematics)Orbit determinationAstronomyPhysicsComputer visionAerospace engineeringSatelliteGeologyMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing congestion in Low Earth Orbit, driven by increased space exploration and satellite deployments, has made Space Situational Awareness more critical than ever. To address this challenge cost-effectively, we propose OrbitTrack, a deep learning-based approach for detecting and tracking RSO using wide field-of-view cameras such as commercial off-the-shelf star trackers. Our method is specifically designed to process the Fast Auroral Imager dataset from the CASSIOPE satellite, which presents unique difficulties such as low frame rates, low resolution, and short-exposure images. Additionally, the satellite’s spin-stabilized nature causes both stars and RSOs to follow curved trajectories, complicating their detection and tracking. OrbitTrack employs YOLOX-Nano, a lightweight real-time object detector, leveraging consecutive images to capture trajectory-based features for more accurate detection. For tracking, we introduce a training-free association mechanism inspired by Simple Online and Realtime Tracking but enhanced to use RSO velocity and center distances to predict future positions and associate tracklets. This method overcomes the limitations of traditional Kalman filter and IoU-based approaches, which struggle with low frame rates, and eliminates the need for hyperparameters such as covariance matrices and IoU thresholds. The system efficiently processes 640 × 640 images in 43 ms and 768 × 768 images in 55 ms on a standard CPU, making it suitable for real-time applications. In experiments, OrbitTrack demonstrates a precision of 97.2 %, recall of 74.2 %, MOTA of 71.4, IDF1 of 81.9, and an ID switch rate of just 0.7 over a stack of three consecutive frames. This represents a significant improvement over the rule-based state-of-the-art method, increasing precision by 10.2 % and recall by 11.2 %. The method’s efficiency and accuracy position OrbitTrack as a promising tool for enhancing Near-Earth space monitoring using existing hardware.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Space ResearchSame topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207