MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Avascular Necrosis of the Hamate Treated with a 4–5 Extensor Compartmental Artery Graft: A Case Report and Literature Review

2025· article· en· W4413029853 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Persitz, Ryan Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Joint Diseases
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAvascular necrosisWristSurgeryRevascularizationDecompressionMagnetic resonance imagingCarpal bonesRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the hamate is an exceptionally rare condition, with limited cases reported in the literature. This case highlights the successful management of idiopathic hamate AVN using core decompression and a vascularized pedicle bone flap from the distal radius based on the 4-5 extensor compartmental artery (ECA). Case Report: A 45-year-old construction worker presented with chronic left wrist pain of 2 years' duration following minor trauma. Despite conservative treatment with cast immobilization, the symptoms persisted. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed AVN of the hamate, prompting surgical intervention involving core decompression and a 4-5 ECA vascularized bone flap supplemented with cancellous autograft. Post-operative follow-up demonstrated significant functional improvement, grip strength restoration, and successful revascularization confirmed by imaging. Conclusion: This report demonstrates the successful use of the 4-5 ECA-based vascularized bone flap technique in managing hamate AVN, as well as a literature review of 13 previously described cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic Case ReportsSame topicBone and Joint DiseasesFrench-language works237,207