Cavitation bubble-induced hydrodynamic loading and interfacial deformation in an air pocket
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of trapped air on a solid surface can alter the direction of the liquid jets induced by cavitation bubbles, which prevents or reduces erosion. In this study, we numerically investigate mutual interaction between air trapped in a pocket on a wall and a nearby bubble in water, as well as the resultant hydrodynamic loading. Both the depth and radius of the cylindrical pocket are similar to the maximum bubble radius. The pressure imposed on the inner wall of the air pocket is assessed for various values of the air pocket size and the stand-off parameter. The deformation of the air pocket and the bubble is analysed in each of three sequential stages. During the bubble expansion stage, a shock wave reflects at the water–air interface of the pocket, and the wall inside the compressed pocket is protected from the shock wave. As the bubble jet induced during bubble contraction tends to move away from the air pocket, other liquid jets formed at the water–air interface, namely central and lateral pocket jets, can directly collide with the inner wall of the pocket after the bubble collapses. These collisions exert significant pressure on the wall under certain conditions. The formation of the central pocket jet originates from the strong fluctuation of the water–air interface by the expanding and contracting bubble. The development of the lateral pocket is related to changes in the potential energy of the air under its second contraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".