MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413030986 · doi:10.62641/aep.v53i4.1975

Therapeutic Effects of Electroencephalogram-Based Bioelectric Stimulation on Cognitive–Behavioural Outcomes in Children With Dual Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability

2025· article· en· W4413030986 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ji-rong He

Bibliographic record

VenueActas Españolas de Psiquiatría · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderPsychologyIntellectual disabilityCognitionClinical psychologyPsychological interventionAutismRating scaleChildhood Autism Rating ScaleIntervention (counseling)Quality of life (healthcare)Developmental psychologyAudiologyPediatricsPsychiatryMedicinePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This investigation evaluates the interventional effects of electroencephalogram-based bioelectric stimulation (EBBS) on intellectual development and behavioural symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and comorbid intellectual disability (ID). METHODS: By utilising a retrospective cohort design, the research team analysed 310 clinically diagnosed cases of ASD and ID that were stratified into two intervention groups: a conventional group (n = 163) receiving conventional interventions (behavioural applied behaviour analysis (ABA) therapy and structured instruction) and an observation group (n = 147) receiving the same behavioural interventions combined with EBBS. Before and following the treatment, the childhood autism rating scale (CARS), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), developmental age and developmental quotient (DQ) and infants-junior middle school students' social-life abilities scale (S-M) were employed to assess symptom alleviation, cognitive capabilities and quality of life. The levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], folic acid (FA) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were also measured. RESULTS: After treatment, the observation group showed significantly lower CARS scores; increased post-treatment serum levels of 25(OH)D, FA and BDNF; and improved MoCA scores than the conventional group (p < 0.05). Regarding developmental age and DQ, the observation group demonstrated significant improvements in the subscales of fine motor skills, language, adaptive ability and social interaction after intervention (p < 0.05). Additionally, the S-M total scores and all quality-of-life indicators were superior in the observation group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: EBBS has the potential to collaboratively enhance the cognitive function, behavioural symptoms and quality of life of children with comorbid ASD and ID.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActas Españolas de PsiquiatríaSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207