Bromodomain proteins IBD1 and IBD2 link histone acetylation to SWR1- and INO80-mediated H2A.Z regulation in Tetrahymena
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: INO80 and SWR1 are evolutionarily related ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes that regulate the chromatin occupancy of the histone variant H2A.Z, playing critical roles in transcriptional regulation, genome replication, and DNA repair. While the H2A.Z-related functions of INO80 and SWR1 are well characterized in budding yeast and metazoans, much less is known about their composition and chromatin-targeting mechanisms outside of the Opisthokonts. We previously found that a distinct bromodomain-containing protein, IBD1, is involved in multiple chromatin-related complexes, including the SWR1-complex, in the ciliate protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila. RESULTS: Here, we report that a closely related bromodomain-containing protein, IBD2, functions as an acetyl lysine reader module within a putative INO80 complex. Through iterative proteomic analyses, we show that the Tetrahymena INO80 complex retains several conserved subunits found in its yeast and metazoan counterparts. In vitro binding assays reveal that recombinant IBD2 preferentially recognizes acetylated histone H3 tails. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) demonstrates that IBD2 is enriched near transcription start sites and promoter regions. Notably, the IBD1 and IBD2 genomic binding profiles strongly correlate with that of H2A.Z (Hv1), supporting their functional association with the SWRI- and INO80-complexes. CONCLUSIONS: Together, our findings support a model in which H2A.Z chromatin dynamics are modulated by SWR1- and INO80-complexes that are differentially recruited to chromatin via distinct bromodomain proteins that recognize specific histone acetylation marks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".