MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413034639 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.06.669004

Identification of natural products and synthetic analogs which inhibit microsporidia spores and prevent infection

2025· preprint· en· W4413034639 on OpenAlexafffund
Qingyuan Huang, Lauren E. Brown, Guoqing Pan, Junhong Wei, John A. Porco, Jie Chen

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsMicrosporidiaSporeIdentification (biology)Natural (archaeology)BiologyMicrobiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Microsporidiosis, a disease caused by microsporidia, affects many animals, with symptoms ranging from diarrhea to death, especially in immunocompromised individuals. Current treatments, such as albendazole and fumagillin, are limited in efficacy. To address this problem, we utilized Caenorhabditis elegans infected with its natural microsporidian Nematocida parisii to evaluate 4,080 structurally diverse compounds from the Boston University Center for Molecular Discovery (BU-CMD) chemical library. From this screen we identified 34 compounds that effectively inhibited N. parisii infection and restored the reproductive capacity of C. elegans . All 17 compounds we validated prevented N. parisii infection in C. elegans , and 10 were capable of suppressing microsporidia invasion by inactivating mature spores. Additionally, five of the identified compounds were also effective against Pancytospora epiphaga , a species related to human - infecting microsporidia. Together this work identifies and characterizes compounds which inhibit microsporidia infection. Importance Microsporidia are a large group of microbial parasites that infect many animals, including humans. Many agriculturally important animals such as honey bees, shrimp, crabs, and fish are infected by microsporidia, and these infections often result in smaller animals, fewer offspring, and death. Only two drugs are commonly used to treat microsporidia infections; due to some species being resistant and host toxicity there is a need to identify other microsporidia inhibitors. In this study, we screened over 4000 small molecules using a model round worm infected with microsporidia. We identified several dozen inhibitors and characterized how these compounds prevented infection by determining which stage of the parasite they act upon. Together our work identified and characterized compounds that could be used as a starting point to design better microsporidia inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207