MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413039147 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.2131

Two-year efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-5/receptor therapy for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

2025· article· en· W4413039147 on OpenAlexaff
Peter A. Merkel, Parameswaran Nair, Nader Khalidi, Benjamin Terrier, Bernhard Hellmich, Arnaud Bourdin, David Jayne, David J. Jackson, Florence Roufosse, Christian Pagnoux, Ulrich Specks, Lena Börjesson Sjö, Calvin N. Ho, Maria Jison, Christopher McCrae, Sofia Necander, Eva Rodríguez‐Suárez, Anat Shavit, Claire Walton, Michael E. Wechsler

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai HospitalSt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
FundersWorking Artist OrgAstraZenecaAmerican Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology
KeywordsGranulomatosis with polyangiitisMedicineEosinophilicImmunologyDermatologyMicroscopic polyangiitisPathologyVasculitisDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To summarise the efficacy and safety of 2 years of anti-interleukin-5/receptor (anti-IL-5/R) therapy in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). METHODS: Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive benralizumab or mepolizumab every 4 weeks during the 52-week double-blind period of the MANDARA trial. Patients entered an open-label extension (OLE) in which they continued benralizumab (benralizumab/benralizumab) or switched from mepolizumab to benralizumab (mepolizumab/benralizumab). Remission (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score = 0 and oral glucocorticoid [OGC] dose ≤4 mg/d), OGC use, relapse, blood eosinophil count (bEOS), and safety up to year 2 (week 104) were reported. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients entered the OLE period (n = 66 benralizumab/benralizumab; n = 62 mepolizumab/benralizumab). At week 104, 41 (62.1%) benralizumab/benralizumab patients and 42 (67.7%) mepolizumab/benralizumab patients were in remission. During OLE year 1, 51 (77.3%) benralizumab/benralizumab patients and 42 (67.7%) mepolizumab/benralizumab patients had no relapses. By weeks 49 to 52, 27 (40.9%) benralizumab/benralizumab patients and 16 (25.8%) mepolizumab/benralizumab patients had withdrawn from OGCs, increasing to 29 (43.9%) and 27 (43.5%) at weeks 101 to 104, respectively; the median cumulative OGC dose was 950 mg and 791 mg during OLE year 1, respectively. The median bEOS among benralizumab/benralizumab-treated patients was 20 cells/µL (at weeks 52 and 100), and in mepolizumab/benralizumab-treated patients, it decreased from 70 cells/µL to 20 cells/µL 4 weeks after switching. Adverse events/serious adverse events were reported in 97.0%/22.7% of benralizumab/benralizumab and 100%/35.5% of mepolizumab/benralizumab patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with EGPA, treatment for 2 years with anti-IL-5/R therapies is associated with durable rates of remission, discontinuation of OGCs, bEOS depletion, and low relapse rates. Switching from mepolizumab to benralizumab enhances bEOS depletion and OGC sparing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207