Small Molecule Activators of Protein Phosphatase 2A Exert Global Stabilising Effects on the Scaffold PR65
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), an important therapeutic target, comprises a scaffold subunit PR65 composed of 15 HEAT (Huntingtin/elongation/A-subunit/TOR1) repeats, a catalytic subunit, and one of many different regulatory subunits that enable binding to specific substrates. Recently, small molecule activators of PP2A (SMAPs) were identified, although their mechanisms of action have not been fully defined. Here we explore the interaction of PR65 with two SMAPs, ATUX-8385 and the non-functional DBK-776, using single-molecule optical tweezers, ensemble methods, and computational analysis. In the absence of SMAP, PR65 shows multiple unfolding and refolding transitions, and the force-extension profiles are very heterogeneous with evidence of misfolding. Similar heterogeneity has been observed for chemical-induced unfolding of tandem-repeat proteins like PR65, a consequence of the internal symmetry of the repeat architecture. In the presence of ATUX-8385, higher unfolding and refolding forces are observed globally, and there is less misfolding, suggesting that ATUX-8385 acts like a pharmacological chaperone. In contrast, DBK-766-binding induces higher unfolding forces for only a few repeats of PR65, suggestive of a more localised effect; moreover, subsequent stretch-relax cycles show that PR65 is irreversibly locked in the unfolded state. Docking and molecular dynamics simulations provide additional insights how SMAP binding modulates PR65 structure and function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".