MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413042908 · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1589756

Scene construction deficits in adolescent PTSD are in sensory, rather than spatial, imagery

2025· article· en· W4413042908 on OpenAlexafffund
Hannah Marlatte, Jennifer D. Ryan, Asaf Gilboa

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPsychologyCognitionFeelingMental imagePopulationSensory systemRecallHippocampal formationClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyPsychiatryNeuroscienceMedicineSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is characterized by memory and imagery disturbances, ascribed in part to structural and functional hippocampal abnormalities. These include impaired mental simulation of past and future events, as well as deficits in imagining novel, neutral, spatially coherent scenes ("scene construction"). Structural hippocampal differences are less consistently found in adolescent PTSD; however, deficits in recalling specific autobiographical memories have been noted. Methods: We examined scene construction ability in adolescents with PTSD, a presumably hippocampal-dependent process. Forty adolescents were recruited through the community: 26 with diverse trauma exposure (7 with PTSD, 19 without PTSD), and 14 non-trauma-exposed healthy controls. Scene construction performance was compared across groups using non-parametric ANOVAs and was related to PTSD symptom severity regardless of group membership using linear regressions. Results: No differences in global scene construction performance were found; however, adolescents with PTSD imagined a smaller proportion of sensory details than control groups. Cognitive ability predicted several aspects of scene construction performance, rather than PTSD severity, as had been expected based on the adult literature. Nonetheless, those higher in avoidance symptoms imagined more person-related details, and trauma-exposed participants also reported feeling more present within their imagined scenes compared to healthy non-trauma-exposed controls. Discussion: Together, these results suggest that hippocampal-dependent deficits in scene construction as seen in adults are not apparent in adolescence, however, changes in sensory imagery are. These findings provide broader insights into PTSD-related cognitive changes during development and inform interventions for this population that focus on sensory experiencing to promote embodiment, even within one's "mind's eye".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Psychology→Same topicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research→French-language works237,207→