MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413050098 · doi:10.1002/jso.28166

Multisocietal Consensus on the Use of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for the Treatment of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A GRADE Approach for Evidence Evaluation and Recommendation

2025· review· en· W4413050098 on OpenAlexaff
Donal J. Brennan, Amy Hawarden, Michela Cinquini, Aditi Bhatt, Sampige Prasanna Somashekhar, Piso Pompiliu, Andreas Brandl, Edward A. Levine, Thanh H. Dellinger, Naoual Bakrin, S. Di Paolo, Lesley-Ann Rea, Dario Baratti, Marcello Guagliò, Shigeki Kusamura, Marcello Deraco

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surgical Oncology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapySerous fluidRandomized controlled trialOvarian cancerOncologyInternal medicineQuality of life (healthcare)Cytoreductive surgeryClinical trialPopulationCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The locoregional treatment of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) comprises of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Recent evidence form randomized trials, has led to controversy related to the use of HIPEC in addition to interval CRS (iCRS) and the role of secondary CRS (sCRS) in patients with the first platinum-sensitive recurrence from high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). This multi-society consensus, coordinated by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) with inputs from ISSPP, SSO, ESSO, and IGCS, evaluated the role of these interventions using the GRADE ADOLOPMENT methodology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An international expert panel reviewed evidence for the use of HIPEC in addition to iCRS in stage 3 high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and the role of sCRS for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent HGSOC. A systematic review assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Recommendations were formulated using the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision framework. RESULTS: HIPEC in addition to iCRS was strongly recommended based on the results of the OVHIPEC-1 trial, which showed significant benefit in RFS (3.5 months) and OS (12 months) without increasing the grade 3-4 morbidity. For the first platinum-sensitive recurrence, a conditional recommendation was made either for sCRS with systemic therapy or systemic therapy alone, reflecting variability in trial outcomes due to heterogeneity in the patient population in the trials and lack of surgical standardization. CONCLUSION: This consensus highlights the benefits of HIPEC in addition of iCRS and key factors that limit its wide-spread use. It underlines the need for individualized decision-making while selecting patients for sCRS. Future research integrating advanced systemic therapies is essential to refine these recommendations and provide equitable access to these complex locoregional treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.324
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Surgical OncologySame topicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesFrench-language works237,207