MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413050645 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329736

Mental health-related, existential, and biological factors are associated with the desire to hasten death in Mexican cancer patients undergoing palliative care: A single-center study

2025· article· en· W4413050645 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oscar Rodríguez-Mayoral, Edith Monreal-Carrillo, Irazú Contreras-Yáñez, Silvia Allende‐Pérez, Évandro Agazzi, Virginia Pascual‐Ramos

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPatient Dignity and Privacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCancerPalliative careDignityQuality of life (healthcare)Lung cancerInternal medicineGerontologyFamily medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The wish to hasten death (WTHD) is a clinically significant phenomenon that arises from complex suffering. It has been predominantly studied in Caucasian populations, emphasizing the importance of gaining more diverse cultural perspectives. This study explores the factors associated with the WTHD in Mexican cancer patients receiving palliative care from one academic center, with a specific focus on its connection to dignity.". PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study, a cross-sectional research conducted between October 12, 2023, and August 30, 2024, involved patients with confirmed cancer diagnoses who were attending a palliative care service. Patients had applied the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI), Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death (SAHD), Brief Edinburgh Depression Scale (BEDS), EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL to assess health-related quality of life, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS) to assess functional capacity, and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. A PDI score ≥55 indicated a fractured sense of dignity (DPD), while a SAHD score ≥1 indicated the WTHD. Factors associated with the WTHD were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis. The study was approved by the IRB. RESULTS: The study included 302 primarily middle-aged (54.5 [45-64]) females (225 [74.5%]), with 9 years of education. They reported high severity of well-being (7 [1-7]) and tiredness (3 [0-6]). Their median KPSS score showed independence (80 [70-80]), despite impacts across all EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL dimensions. DPD was noted in 110 patients (36.5%). The most frequent diagnoses were breast cancer (114 [38%]), lung cancer (33 [11%]), and gastrointestinal cancer (28 [9%]). The WTHD was found in 94 patients (31.1%). Factors significantly associated included tiredness score (OR: 1.147, 95% CI: 1.044-1.261, p = 0.004), BEDS score (1.181, 1.085-1.284, p ≤ 0.001) and a DPD (1.979, 1.038-3.772, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The WTHD was found in one out of every three Mexican cancer patients receiving palliative care and was linked to biological-, mental health-, and existential-related factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicPatient Dignity and PrivacyFrench-language works237,207