MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413054196 · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-06813-4

Mental health care seeking behavior in Bangladesh: determinants and treatment gaps

2025· article· en· W4413054196 on OpenAlexaff
Rumana Huque, Abul Kalam Azad, Khaleda Islam, Helal Uddin Ahmed, Mohammad Robed Amin

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthOrdered probitProbitMarital statusProbit modelPopulationPsychiatryMultivariate probit modelHealth careLogitHelp-seekingOrdered logitPsychologyMedicineClinical psychologyEnvironmental healthStatisticsEconomic growthEconometricsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The study provides evidence of the existing pattern of mental healthcare-seeking behavior and treatment gaps among the adult population in Bangladesh and identifies the factors associated with mental healthcare-seeking behavior in the country. METHODS: We used the National Mental Health Survey Bangladesh 2019 dataset with 7270 households to identify the patterns of and facilitators for seeking mental health care in Bangladesh. A Probit model using a standard normal cumulative distribution function (CDF) with three specifications has been applied to identify the factors influencing mental healthcare-seeking behavior and the probability of seeking mental healthcare services in Bangladesh. We also compared the probit model results with the logit model (a similar method) to examine the consistency of the findings. RESULTS: The study finds a large treatment gap for mental health care seeking in Bangladesh. We found that about 90% of mental health patients do not seek mental healthcare services in the country. Among the different mental health disorders, addictive disorder is found with the highest treatment gap (95.24%), while bipolar disorder is observed with the lowest treatment gap (65.63%). Both the logit and probit model shows that the existence of a mentally disordered patient in a family is the only statistically significant determinant that increases the probability of seeking mental health care for other family members among the socio-economic factors, such as gender, age, marital status, religion, education level, household size, and residential status. The marginal effects analysis shows that the existence of a mentally disordered family member increases the probability of seeking mental health care services by around 6% both in logit and probit models. By disaggregating the sample observations into women and men, we also found that marital status and household size are significant determinants. The other socio-economic variables considered in the study are found statistically insignificant. The lesser tendency to seek mental health treatment in the country requires policy intervention by government and non-government organizations. CONCLUSION: Though mental health conditions are major public health concerns in Bangladesh, the treatment-seeking behavior among people with mental health disorders is very low, implying a large treatment gap for mental health conditions. The findings indicate the urgent need to increase mental health service coverage among mental health patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychiatrySame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207